shopping cart

training intensity and where to draw the line

training intensity and where to draw the line

John Danaher recently posted an excellent summary regarding his philosophy on training intensity to his Instagram page:

Variations in intensity: When you have a training room full of talented athletes many assume that every sparring session must look like the world championships. In fact I much prefer to limit the amount of really hard sparring the athletes partake in. Of course it’s good to go hard every so often and test yourself, especially when competition is coming up. But continuous hard sparring lead to two undesirable effects – injury and technical stagnation. When we fight hard against someone of similar size and skill level we usually have to fall back on our favorite moves to prevail. Only when we spar in a less competitive setting do we relax a little and try new moves and tactics and thus make technical progress. Surprisingly then, you will often see more outright physical intensity in a beginners class, where the students lack the technical depth to play a finesse game and have to go as hard as they can, than you will in a more advanced class, where the athletes know how to control their pace. In fact, even in a room full of killers like this, the majority of your sparring sessions should be with people below your skill level so that you can work on new skills in a setting conducive to learning. There is always a chance to go hard when you need it – but don’t neglect your experimental sparring – for that is where much of your progress comes from. Here, Gordon Ryan spars with Craig Jones, even in this case, unless there is a specific need for intensity, the primary emphasis is on skill development rather than banging heads and going as hard as possible

This comes shortly after a spectacular episode of The Joe Rogan Experience featuring touted GSP trainer Firas Zahabi where the same topic was the primary focus of the podcast – with very similar conclusions (makes sense, GSP is a trainee of both Danaher and Zahabi). Consider the bolded text above when planning your training for the week – perhaps a higher-volume, lower-intensity approach will yield more significant technical gains given the lessened probability of injury.

After integrating much of the Danaher leg locking system into our curriculum, we’re excited to announce that we will be adding in his back-attack material from his recently-released series (and once it comes out, his headlock series). See you on the mat!

 

Older Post Newer Post